DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NROO851-14
21 July 2014
This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction
of Naval Record (DD Form 149).
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 July 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420
Ser 91/085 memo of 28 May 2014, a copy of which was previously
provided to you on 4 dun 2014, and which is now enclosed. You
had the opportunity to respond within 30 days, but failed to do
so.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingiy, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it 1s important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
f an official
when applying for a correction ©
o demonstrate the
den igs on the applicant t
yial error or injustice.
Consequently,
naval record, the bur
existence of probable mate
Sincerely,
ih ere vena =>, (Asa
<<)
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0894 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with Adil material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0879 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROO879-14 21 July 2614 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by *he Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR03387 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3387 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7250 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered’ your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR7250-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of 7 probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7887 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 20 May 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7887-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1885 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/c537 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 15 0 existence of probable materia Enclosure: Docket No.